Some argues that past conservation policies failed to preserve the link between a building and its larger community, losing much of its historical colours. Other scholars believe that conservation should serve the practical needs of the community. With little legal safeguards and social awareness, conservation projects have met little success. Are there any good recommendations?政府已推出「活化歷史建築伙伴計劃」，致力保育具有特色和歷史價值的建築。長春社總監指出，以往的保育政策沒有把整個建築群保留，削弱了建築物與社區的連繫，令建築物失去本來的光彩。有學者認為，活化建築物的目標應為社區帶來實際的需要。現行法例保障不足，社區漠視又欠缺認識，令歷史建築物的保育工作一直未見成效。他們有什麼好建議呢？
